Let’s say I, a middle aged cis man went to my doctor, wanting gender affirming care, and my doctor wanted to provide - what, if anything, would the treatment/care consist of? Just making sure my testosterone level was up to Hegseth-approved standards?
This has big “only trans people have gender identity” energy.
Straw man argument.
Edit:
This is literally a straw man argument, because it argues against a claim I never made. I never claimed cis people don’t have gender identity, that’s an outright moronic claim.
Plebs. 🙄
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Not an straw man at all, they’re not caricaturizing the other person’s argument.
By definition it doesn’t have to be a caricature. But the comment argues against a point I never made, that is a straw man argument.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
Lol refuting a different argument it’s a red herring fallacy, also know as “false clue”. A straw man is responding to a caricaturized and weaker version of the opponent’s argument.
No I just linked the definition and quoted from it, I have proved you wrong yet you persist?!
Denying reality is not a form of debate.
Red herring is changing facts to mislead from the actual issue.
So your own post is a red herring.
Lmao
I have my source too:
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falacia#mwAV0%3A~%3Atext=viceversa%2C+cometiendo+circularidad.-%2CFalacia+del+hombre+de+paja%2Cla+de+la+persona+A.%2C-Historia
You don’t know the meaning of the word.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man
this is a textbook example of a strawman argument.
You have poor reading comprehension.