Kangae_Hishiryo

Lmao

I have my source too:

https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falacia#mwAV0%3A~%3Atext=viceversa%2C+cometiendo+circularidad.-%2CFalacia+del+hombre+de+paja%2Cla+de+la+persona+A.%2C-Historia

Lol refuting a different argument it’s a red herring fallacy, also know as “false clue”. A straw man is responding to a caricaturized and weaker version of the opponent’s argument.

Not an straw man at all, they’re not caricaturizing the other person’s argument.

I wouldn’t trust SlopeneOS, so…

You have a good point, actually 🤣

But people prefer to follow the one who “knows everything” and that never shows any kind of doubt or insecurity.

C’mon, precisely because they’re in the “Dunning-Kruger” sector of the bell curve is why they can have a big influence in a lot of people.

What the hell are these vomits…

“BrO, bUt ThE mErItOcRaCy, ThE uNiVeRsE gIvEs YoU wHaT yOu AcTuAlLy DeSiRe WiThIn ThE dEpThS oF yOuR iNnEr SoUl”

They cause public attitudes in most cases, so…

Yeah, they’re just fucking plain sociopaths, psychopaths, narcissistic, egolatrical and evil.

They literally don’t just make Concentration Camps against the poor and the homeless because that would be too brazen and obvious, I fucking hate them.

Based.

ACAB.

Black Tiger Sex Machine goes brrr

That’s not a valid justifier, they’re just immature because that’s something that anybody should know: not for anything it stills falls into the “sonic pollution” category.

If you don’t respect public spaces and are destroying other people’s peace because you don’t know how to stay silent, then you’re not well-adjusted at all.

Based on their narcissism and egolatry *

CEO and Marketing

Anyone in Silicon Valley, but especially Sam Altman, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, Bill Gates and anyone who has anything to do with Apple.

Well… Empty empty, I don’t think so; think about the whole issue of vacuum energy and the consequent virtual particle-antiparticle pairs, or the mere fact of the existence of quantum fields that permeate everything — like the field responsible for mass itself, the Higgs field.

That’s a simplification; a useful one, but a simplification nonetheless.

Well, about these messages I have to agree with you, but I can’t simply agree with absolutely anything else.

Let’s see, I’m not from the United States so I don’t know their situation well (although I must say that I HATE Trump anyway), but I’m from Venezuela, which is really much, MUCH worse; Nicolás Maduro was literally a fucking dictator who killed anyone who dared to mock him (if you’ve never heard of Helicoide, I recommend looking it up), and now that they took Maduro they left us with Delcys Rodríguez, who is another fucking harpy. I really cannot understand how someone who has not experienced a true dictatorship and who has not faced offense and repression for ideological reasons can say so calmly that freedom of expression should be limited; What blissful ignorance of yours to live in a bubble like that, you make me sick (with every intention to offend :3). It really seems absurd to me how you think that “emotional harm” is a valid criterion or is in any way different from offense; No, they can apply in different areas, but epistemically and ontologically they are the same: pure subjective whim, and an ideology that the world revolves around you and your problems.

I’ll put it to you this other way:

1. Or only some speeches are prohibited (therefore falling into totalitarian arbitrariness).
2. Or all speeches are prohibited (and therefore language and existence themselves are also prohibited, in a non-metaphorical, non-figurative and non-hyperbolic, but literal sense).
3. Or no speech is prohibited, but only real and concrete actions (a defamation, a social lynching, a false denunciation, a fraud, a robbery, a coup or a murder), and, at most, imperative speeches (not a mere “hatred of X” but an explicit “X should die”).

Strict logic is the only reasonable law, and your ideology falls under the above reductio ad absurdum.