when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 5 months ago[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?message-squaremessage-square273linkfedilinkarrow-up1172arrow-down139file-text
arrow-up1133arrow-down1message-square[Ethics] Why do people condemn Zoophilia on the basis of other animal's inability to consent but those same people kill animals without asking for their consent? Why such inconsistency?when@lemmy.world to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · 5 months agomessage-square273linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squarewhen@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-25 months agoThe question is on social acceptance of killing innocent animals while condemning zoophila. How come murder of innocent accepted but rape is considered a sin? Should we not come to an ideal conclusion and stop both?
minus-square__hetz@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·5 months agoThey weren’t replying seriously. It’s a reference to the film “Clerks II.”
The question is on social acceptance of killing innocent animals while condemning zoophila. How come murder of innocent accepted but rape is considered a sin? Should we not come to an ideal conclusion and stop both?
They weren’t replying seriously. It’s a reference to the film “Clerks II.”