A friend is looking for one and I don’t know what to recommend.

Assuming that the goal is to never connect it to the internet and plug in another device with HDMI.

  • Nikls94@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I was kind of expecting the comments to be the way they are, which is nice.

    Preferably a TV with no smart features.

    Or just take the cheapest option and never connect it to the internet.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wouldn’t get a television. I would get a monitor. No UI. No smart features. Just a black square that had HDMI inputs.

    If you really want to watch OTA TV, you can buy box tuners that connect to the HDMI. Usually with DVR capability.

    It will cost more. Like…a LOT more. But thats just what regular TVs used to cost back in the 90s. You wanted a bigscreen tv? $800 then, which would be like $2,000 now. And “big screen” was like 55 inch. Though it was a 4:3 ratio. So 55 inch then wold be more like 70 inch now in a 16:9 ratio.

    • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Honestly, same with me. I’d go for a CRT TV, though, and play old video games through that (or just connect a PC to a smaller monitor that’s manageable).

  • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    Since I use a PC with a TV and ignore the “smart” infestures entirely and never connect to the internet unless I become aware of a bug fix that concerns the displayed picture, it doesn’t matter much to me. I just compare panel quality on the fly with my phone while out buying one and check for any deal breakers like a high failure rate or something. I’d look for microLED /w an adequate amount of dimming zones, HDR1000, VRR Freesync, and 120hz. The last two times I went during winter holidays and bought heavily discounted clearance last year’s models 75" panels. Won’t again until it breaks. Edit: LG currently but I have no brand loyalty.

  • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    It would also need speakers (I recommend plug in kind) but I really like my Epson 3200 projector: Bright enough to use in the day, my screen is 120", and there’s no “smart” garbage.

    If you want an actual TV, look at commercial displays instead of stuff from big box stores: They will be more expensive, but won’t have any of the junky ad ridden stuff.

  • codenamekino@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I dont see it mentioned here, but I went with a 75" Spectre earlier this year. I had a 40" Spectre that was given to me third- hand, and I only replaced it because it was too small for the new place I moved into. Spectre doesn’t seem to even offer smart TV, and I wanted to support that decision. The only potential downside that you may see is the lack of a 4k offering, but that wasn’t something I care about.

  • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    13 hours ago

    The Dell P5524Q is a 55" conference room monitor. It has no built-in wifi, microphones, camera, or other smart tv bullshit, it’s just a big monitor. It just turns on when you turn it on and turns off when you turn it off - it doesn’t take 5 minutes to boot up because of the shitty low-grade computer hardware built into it. You can find them on eBay in the US$900 range.

      • Fondots@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Almost 2 decades ago I paid close to that for a 50" plasma TV as one of my first big purchases after I got my first job.

        Of course this isn’t a direct 1:1 comparison, they’re different display technologies, TVs these days have a 4k if not 8k resolution when that one I bought was 720p, there’s been almost 20 years of advancement driving costs down, and 20 years of inflation driving them up, etc.

        So I don’t even know where to begin trying to fairly compare the relative costs of those 2 TVs

        But back then tv manufacturers also weren’t getting paid to include apps, and put a button on their remotes to launch Amazon prime, or show me ads, or anything of the sort. Their only revenue stream was me buying the tv.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Well you can get a smart TV of that size for $300 or less. Which you can always just not hook up to the Internet, still have to deal with a crappy operating system but I don’t think that’s worth $600 to avoid really. Also elsewhere in this thread there’s a link to a Samsung non-smart TV of that size for 600 so I really think 900 is too much.

  • palordrolap@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    There’s at least one supplier here in the UK that still sells free-to-air-only dumb TVs. Digital of course, because we turned off analogue TV signals years ago, but no smarter than that. Definitely no Internet connectivity.

    If I decided I was going to become a regular TV watcher again, I’d probably get one of those.

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    11 hours ago

    LG OLED. You can find last year’s models at some price clubs. I’ve seen the 65” C4 for like $1100 which is great.

    • deranger@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Seriously. I’ve had an LG B7 for many years now and it’s amazing. It’s not internet connected and I don’t use any of the built in apps. Straight up display.

      The first time a pitch black scene came on and my room likewise went pitch black was something else. No going back from OLED after that.

      • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 hours ago

        I think that’s the same OLED I have. B7 or C7. It’s starting to band on red, but I got at least… 7 (?) years out of it, and the bands are only mildly annoying. Similarly, I have never connected it to the internet, and don’t use any of the apps.

        It’s not very bright, but I’ll take that over washed out or blotchy blacks. I’ll shop for a used OLED like this when I’m ready.

  • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Sony Bravia. Because I just did this last year. My old TV was also a Bravia, and it lasted about 15 years. One big selling feature for me was that you can set it up as either a smart TV, or a ‘basic’ TV that doesn’t require an Internet connection and doesn’t pester you for one.

  • rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I know you asked for TV recommendations, but, if your friend is open to other ideas, they could also look into home theater projectors. I got a super cheap projector on sale a few years ago and being able to watch TV and movies on a 150 inch screen is absolutely bitchin’. I later upgraded to a higher quality projector cause the cheap one crapped out after about a year (and replacement bulbs were impossible to find due to the supply chain issues during early covid). Spent about the same amount on the high quality projector that I would have spent on a much smaller TV.

    Though there’s obviously drawbacks to projectors:

    • They generate a lot of heat. In the hottest months of the year, I don’t like turning it on
    • You will initially blind yourself a lot by accidentally looking at it when it’s turned on. After blinding yourself a dozen or so times you’ll develop the muscle memory to avoid it.
    • You gotta replace the bulbs periodically, but they last for thousands of hours. My current bulb has about 5000 hours on it and still doesn’t need to be replaced.
    • Contrast is really weak compared to a TV. Need to close the curtains and not let sunlight into the room if you want to be able to see the picture clearly
    • Need a big surface to project the picture onto, ideally a screen, but a blank wall works just fine.

    When we moved into our house a few years ago, I saw there was an elevated alcove in the living room with a big, blank wall on the opposite side of the room. I knew right then that it would be perfect for a projector.

    Movie night kicks ass. Every re-watch of Lord of the Rings is like watching it in the theater again. And Superbowl Sundays are epic on the big screen.

    I have an Epson 2250 and it’s worked nicely these past few years.

    • FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 hours ago

      If you get a brighter projector, you could probably view it in daylight pretty well. I have an Epson 3200 and it was a massive jump up from my old Viewsonic 8200. Refurbished/renewed can help save you money too.

    • onslaught545@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I need to look into one when our TV craps out. Our house is always super dim because of the roof overhang, so a projector would probably work really well.