overload@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agoWe all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?message-squaremessage-square157linkfedilinkarrow-up161arrow-down17file-text
arrow-up154arrow-down1message-squareWe all know grammar Nazis. What incorrect grammar are you completely in defence of?overload@sopuli.xyz to Asklemmy@lemmy.ml · edit-21 year agomessage-square157linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareoverload@sopuli.xyzOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·edit-21 year agoI think if I took it too far and said that all contractions are basically acceptable, y’all’d’n’t’ve agreed with me.
minus-squareForester@pawb.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-21 year agoYou all did not have
minus-squarekryptonite@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoIt would be “You all would not have” because “You all did not have agreed with me” doesn’t make sense.
minus-squareℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoAnd I understood it perfectly the first time, which makes it acceptable by my lights.
minus-squareBluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·1 year agoI’d’n’t’ve had a single issue with it. In fact, I quite enjoy multi-contractions
minus-squareTʜᴇʀᴀᴘʏGⒶʀʏ⁽ᵗʰᵉʸ‘ᵗʰᵉᵐ⁾@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI use this one unironically lol
I think if I took it too far and said that all contractions are basically acceptable, y’all’d’n’t’ve agreed with me.
This looks aggressively welsh.
You all did not have
It would be “You all would not have” because “You all did not have agreed with me” doesn’t make sense.
And I understood it perfectly the first time, which makes it acceptable by my lights.
I’d’n’t’ve had a single issue with it. In fact, I quite enjoy multi-contractions
I use this one unironically lol