As simple as possible to summarize the best way you can, first, please. Feel free to expand after, or just say whatever you want lol. Honest question.

  • @Geodad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 days ago

    They’re testable and reproducible.

    Any number of mathematicians can work a problem, and if done correctly will reach the same result.

    The same goes for logic.

      • @Geodad@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        114 days ago

        So you can’t use the bible to prove god exists, eh?

        Math is just our understanding of how the universe works. Logic is just our description of how to correctly reason.

        • @Manmoth@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          I’m not using the Bible. I’m using the Transcendental Argument.

          Math is just our understanding of how the universe works. Logic is just our description of how to correctly reason.

          Okay. If these things are just descriptors then they aren’t universally true. If they exist and are universally true then you have no account for how that is the case. Either way you are using immaterial, metaphysical concepts to make the case that things that are immaterial and metaphysical don’t exist.