Our waterways are becoming more and more polluted due to PFAS, plastics, medicines, drugs, and new chemicals made by companies that just hand over the responsibility of cleaning to plants paid for by public moneys. Detecting the different chemicals and filtering them out if getting harder and harder. Could the simple solution of heating up past a point where even PFAS/forever chemicals decomposes (400C for PFAS, 500C to be more sure about other stuff) be alright?

  • @ptc075@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2718 hours ago

    At the risk of sounding silly - Instead of focusing on burning the solids, boil the water. Water boils at 100C, at which point the water vapor should separate and leave all the solids behind. Then capture the vapors and condense it back down into clean water. Now, if you later want to incinerate the leftover solids, sure, go for it, fire’s always cool in my book.

    I’ll add, simply boiling water is energy intensive. What you are proposing probably won’t work at any scale.

    • @I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      713 hours ago

      Golly gee, if only there were some form of energy generation that required boiling vast amounts of water to turn into steam. But no, that would be silly.

    • @x00z@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      815 hours ago

      I thought about this too for a while but I learned that even rain contains microplastics.

    • atro_cityOP
      link
      fedilink
      417 hours ago

      That might be possible but there are particles that also will be present in vapor which might be toxic. Simply sending the out into the atmosphere would probably not be a good idea. PFAS for example do not break down under ~400C and just creating a fine PFAS mist is probably not what we want.

      But yes, of course while heating up the water there will be residue. How to dispose of that will probably also have to be thought of. Maybe 500C is also the answer, but I don’t know.