Oh, that’s an idea. Unfortunately my work has no union. Tech is full of rugged individuals.

Is it better to skip work entirely or go and just goof off? Probably the former?

Pretty much every time I go to one of the local grocery stores I see a crew of firefighters roll up in their truck buying food.

I just link people to good posts I find on here.

You’re not going to get a typical apathetic person to change anything.

know your rights! All three of them!

You have the right not to be killed

Murder is a crime!

Unless it was done by a police man…

The clash from 1982 still timely

…what? Go do something else instead of watching YouTube-style content then. Read a book. Take up knitting. Do crosswords.

You can live a full life without Internet videos.

• Bandcamp
• see who tours together. If you like A and they open for B, you might like B
• indie record labels
• see who’s playing at local venues.

Honestly, probably yes. People are emotional and a face to face conversation can be a big impact.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_canvassing is one take on it

Zohran had many volunteers knocking on doors and talking to people. He’s also charismatic, and focused on concrete actionable things.

It’s hard to get people mad about “let’s run buses on time”.

I don’t let the problem get that bad in the first place.

On my computer, I close the browser end of day and all the tabs go away. On my phone, it auto archives tabs I haven’t looked at in a week. I close those periodically, but a few I use as off brand bookmarks (eg: a recipe I like)

I’ve sent this to many coworkers.

I wanted to introduce a jar where every time you sent a useless “hello” message you had to put double whatever you put in last time (starting at $1). People are empty headed idiots maybe losing +$1000 will wake them up.

I feel like online spaces like lemmy over represent some behaviors.

I guess I’m lucky almost no one I know is trying to side hustle slop their way into money. I don’t think I would put up with that happily.

Mark is a good, kind person

No he’s not.

He has done tremendous, incalculable, harm to countless people. All of our lives are worse because Zuckerberg is an asshole.

I’m not sure what you’re trying to ask but maybe this comic will be interesting anyway

https://theoatmeal.com/comics/believe

People are idiots. They believe things that feel good.

I’ve read your post a dozen times and I’m confused.

Are you at the $5 million cap in this scenario? You’re certainly not going to waste away with $500k/year coming in, labor free.

Or are you closer to median income of like $80k, and thus have no funds for a big passion project?

Either way, you can always pool resources and form an organization of some sort. We don’t really want a ton of power collected in individuals. Especially not if the only reason they have that power is because they had money.

No one needs more than $5 million. That’s enough for a conservative investment portfolio to give you a mid six figure income without doing any labor. Watch TV all day and eat chips, still net six figures.

Maybe then no one can afford mega mansions and mega yachts, but I’m okay with that. We don’t need that much concentration of wealth.

Capitalism. The people with the money aren’t the people working. They don’t care that much about the people working. The people working haven’t organized enough for their demands to be met. There’s always plenty of scabs willing to lick the boots for a few pennies more.

Not included in this answer and I’m not fully qualified to talk about: salting.

If you knew the hashing algorithm, you could precompute hashes of all the common passwords. Then when you get steal the hashed password data, it’s a lot faster to check if any of them are in your list. You can likely find that kind of list online to download.

One defense against this is “salting”. The site adds some text to your password before hashing it. So if your password is extremely common, like “password1!”, with the added salt the hash on this site will be different. Like maybe it adds the user’s uuid, so what gets hashed is “password1!-abcd-123-pretend-this-is-a-uuid”. The user doesn’t need to know.

Another benefit is that now two passwords that both are “password1!” have different hashes.

I’m not an expert by any means so please someone correct me if anything was wrong there.