

Gaming is the lowest of YouTube content. It’s like those reaction videos.


Gaming is the lowest of YouTube content. It’s like those reaction videos.


So what you are saying the most important job of a creator is to create a thumbnail? So it’s not bad if a creator is using ai for the thumbnail?
That’s like if a guitarist is saying plugging the strings is really important so I use ai for it. I am just a guitarist I can not do all


That’s so true!!! There is this other channel even smaller yes they have the script also written by ai but it’s not the end of the world. There is this yt creator that is even smaller who is using ai voice. Not the end of the world. There is this yt creator who automated the whole process. Don’t get me wrong I don’t like ai to take jobs but I’m this case!/s


Squeeze together? “Oh you came late? No those three seats are my personal space I want untouched. If you arrived at the same time as I did I would have done the same but not mentioned it on the Internet”


I use it professionally. You are talking to a toddler or a professional and you never know. It’s like an interview where the person tries to get a job but you want to use it in production.
Had to check now it’s not funny anymore 😞


Oh no. A country that surveillance is too much forces you to use a app? No no no no you poor thing!
Let’s unpack that. “AI is here to stay” is a prediction, not an ethical argument. Wanting artistic jobs to remain human isn’t the same as opposing every use of technology.
Art isn’t merely a content-delivery pipeline. The artist is part of the point. If your “ethical use” involves treating human creativity as an inefficiency to eliminate, your human-centered framework may require further optimization.
Ultimately, calling people stupid is not a substitute for engaging with their argument. It’s simply an underwhelming demonstration of the intelligence you’re defending.