• BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    If you dig into what we know about human brains, you might find out we aren’t that different. We come up with words based on the previous words just like processing tokens.

    We may have a better model, and more advanced hard(wet)ware but it’s still very much a predictive process based on context.

    • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      lol no, no there is no equivalence between associating words with actual things and deriving further words, and calculating the likelihood of words appearing after other words. At all.

      • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        ah, Clearly you have the superior brain. Smarter than all the doctors who study this shit.

        Good for you, I hope you get the Nobel Prize for Medicine for enlightening the world on how the human brain actually works.

        • spankysalmon@fedinsfw.app
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          lol

          I speak knowing more than you. I’m also talking about “AI”. You bet your ass I know more about LLMs and other types of “AI” than the vast majority of doctors, including those with doctorates in computer science.