I mean, just declare a republic ffs.

  • pwnicholson
    link
    fedilink
    107 days ago

    That’s an argument against an executive branch of government, not an argument against a constitutional monarchy.

    You could have (and many countries do) a parliamentary system like you describe without having a monarch figurehead.

    The question I think OP is asking is: why have the monarch figurehead.

    • Hemingways_Shotgun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      27 days ago

      Because, and not to sound flippant, that’s just the easiest and most natural way to do it without a lot of extra paperwork.

      See technically, a "president* is meant as a drop in replacement for a monarch. A republic doesn’t get rid if its king, they just replace one who was born into it with one they chose and one they pretend to have a bit more control over.

      Canada’s equivalent to Trump isn’t Carney, technically it’s King Charles. And the U.S equivalent to Prime Minister would be who’ve leads the majority party in congress.

      Could we go through the constitutional rigamarole to change that? Sure. But why bother when he’s content to stay out of things.

      Essentially, a parliamentary democracy means that our “Trump” is a deadbeat dad who lives in another country.

      I’ll happily keep that buffer in place versus whatever the fuck the U.S had gotten themselves into.

      • @Merva@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        57 days ago

        There are lots of republics where the president does serve as a literal figurehead without any consequential powers, so a republic does not necessarily turn up with a Trump. In fact the US is rather unique in how it has combined republic with absolute monarchy in the office of the president, probably very much a sign of how antiquated the constitution is.

        • Skua
          link
          fedilink
          17 days ago

          Additionally, a figurehead monarch doesn’t address any of the issues with a successful Trump-like politician. Here in the UK I often hear people saying “would you want a President Boris Johnson?” No, I wouldn’t, but him being called Prime Minister instead of President removed literally none of his practical political power

        • Hemingways_Shotgun
          link
          fedilink
          English
          27 days ago

          I feel like that’s sarcasm? But yes, I legitimately feel that our system, where the only person who has any “theoretical” power to make unilateral decisions without parliament is some old guy who is content to just stay out of it, is better.

          Imagine an America where they could tell Trump. “Okay, you’re king. Here…we’ll even put you on our money. Now go live overseas and fuck off”