@thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 6 days agoShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?message-square74fedilinkarrow-up148arrow-down16
arrow-up142arrow-down1message-squareShould a movie released in 1995 be considered an "old" movie?@thewanderingbackpack@lemmy.world to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 6 days agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-square@remotelove@lemmy.calinkfedilink5•6 days agoSorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph. Good try though. ;)
minus-square@over_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•6 days agoHah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍 As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
minus-square@remotelove@lemmy.calinkfedilink3•6 days agoI actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.) And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.
Sorry, I couldn’t quite get the feeling you described. It’s partially because I have seen that before and partially because it still looks old and the sound quality was reminiscent of a cylinder phonograph.
Good try though. ;)
Hah, interesting that you’ve seen that before, cool cool 👍
As crappy as the audio is, honestly it’s still pretty good for when it was made.
I actually like the audio. (I’ll leverage faux tape recording effects and plate reverb on occasion with music I write.)
And honestly, it was kinda refreshing to watch Charlie Chaplain again.