I’m quite younger so I wasn’t around that format war but depends on who you ask you get different responses.

  • UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Didn’t Blu-ray win because it was basically neck and neck with the amount of studios backing HD-DVD vs Blu-ray. I think everyone was waiting to see what the final studio would pick (off the top of my head it was either Fox or Warner Bros).

    Sony paid said studio basically a massive multi $m bribe to pick Blu-ray (to help promote their new console, the Playstation 3) which they duly did and that format was declared the winner.

    HD-DVD would’ve been great as the winner as the specifications don’t include any form of region protection. But blurays hold more data and therefore allows for better quality encodes.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      It seemed more like PS3 decided the winner to me at the time , since it came with a blue ray drive while the xb360 only came with a DVD drive and the HD-DVD drive was sold separately.

    • Album@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      Specifically my report from 2006 notes a lack of critical studio and manufacturer support for HDDVD. To create the bluray standard, many studios and manufactures worked together to create the format, where HD-DVD had a much smaller group of people onboard from the get-go.

      Additionally, the sony support of BluRay in the PS3 at effectively no cost to the consumer meant that such a large population would have the required equipment on hand.

      Blurway also had a higher density disc, which was critical to the longevity of the platform.

      My report didnt actually cover licensing, so i am definitely mis-remembering on that.